| |
|
|
| |
Bringing
engineering
to
life
|
|
 |
It’s hard enough to understand how
life works. But to be able to mathematically analyze the
complexity of living systems and design technology that will
work for, with and within human beings raises the bar
significantly. And when you factor in the ever-expanding
frontiers of knowledge in the life sciences and technology, that
bar gets higher every year.
“Bioengineering lies at the intersection of biology, physics,
chemistry, engineering and mathematics,” says Thomas R. Harris,
M.D., Ph.D., director of the
Vanderbilt-Northwestern-Texas-Harvard/MIT Engineering Research
Center in Bioengineering Technologies (VaNTH). “The growing
complexity in these fields has similarly complicated the
bioengineering field, and that presents a challenge for
educators who are trying to give students a foundation without
requiring even more years of education.”
|
|
“Challenge” is the operative
word here.
VaNTH researchers have developed “challenge-based” educational
techniques that are helping students understand the complexities of
the material they must master by organizing the material around
challenging problems they must tackle.
For example, here’s one challenge Vanderbilt
Professor Robert Roselli uses in his undergraduate biotransport
course: As a biomedical engineer, you are called to testify as an
expert witness on behalf of the defendant, who is accused of murder.
The body of her boyfriend was found at 5:30 a.m. in a creek behind
her house. The prosecutor’s expert witness places the time of death
at about midnight. The defendant has witnesses that account for her
whereabouts before 11:00 p.m. and after 2:00 a.m., but she cannot
provide an alibi for the period between 11:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. How
did the prosecutor's expert witness arrive at the time of death?
What information will you need to challenge that assessment?
“Students found this module to be fun and interesting because they
could relate it to popular TV shows based on crime-scene
investigations,” Roselli says. To get an accurate idea of the time
of death, students learn about a variety of techniques, such as
heat-transfer coefficients in air as well as water, and asymmetry of
heat loss throughout the body. As they continue to research the
problem and gain deeper understanding of the issues, their
assessments change.
“The take-home message of this module is that models are only as
accurate as the information provided and the validity of the
assumptions made in their construction,” Roselli says. “That is a
tremendously valuable lesson for these students to learn as future
bioengineers.”
Classroom testing
The challenge-based techniques pioneered by VaNTH are proving even
more successful than researchers had initially hoped. VaNTH testbed
classrooms all over the country have turned in results that
demonstrate that the challenge-based modules developed by VaNTH are
more effective than ordinary classroom lectures.
What’s more, the techniques are helping produce what VaNTH calls
“adaptive experts.”
“The issue is innovation and how to teach it,” Harris says. “An
adaptive expert can solve problems never seen before, whereas a
routine expert fits a new problem into an existing pattern.
“We used to spend a lot of time focusing on teaching efficiency and
then make the adaptive leap in the senior year with a capstone
design course that puts things together in an innovative way. Now
we’re building innovation and efficiency as we go along,” he says.
Harris says that the heart of the technique is that students are
more highly motivated to acquire basic knowledge and skills because
they are motivated by thinking aboiut the challenge first. This
motivation allows them to take ownership in both the solution and
the process.
STAR Legacy Cycle
The process is outlined in what VaNTH calls the STAR Legacy Cycle.
After being presented with the challenge, students brainstorm and
share ideas about what they know and what they think they must learn
about the problem. Then they do their own research and study to find
out which of their ideas have merit, which leads to other proposed
solutions.
Professors can guide and give feedback, and with the help of VaNTH-developed
assessment materials, can monitor student progress and determine
what additional assistance might be needed. Even standard lectures
become more effective in this context because the challenge has
created a “time for telling”.
Challenge-based techniques are based on learning science research,
as outlined in the seminal work, /How People Learn. / This book,
published by the National Research Council and edited by former
Vanderbilt Centennial Professor of Psychology and Education John
Bransford and associates, outlines radically different educational
techniques from the traditional lecture format.
In addition to organizing and presenting the material differently,
the modules incorporate use of web-based interactive programs that
supplement classroom experience with computer-based exercises and
materials.
Dozens of modules and collections of these modules known as
“mosaics” have been developed by VaNTH researchers and are being put
to use in college, high school and middle school classrooms.
Professors and teachers can use the modules and can also develop new
ones, using authoring software developed by VaNTH.
The authoring software and assessment software VaNTH developed are
some of the tools educators need to incorporate challenge-based
techniques in their classrooms. The authoring software gives
professors and teachers a framework and an environment in which to
develop material using challenge-based techniques. The software was
designed to give professors numerous resources to create modules
that are vibrant, interactive and engaging.
Educators can also use VaNTH’s assessment systems to help determine
how much of the material their students are absorbing, and where
additional intervention might be needed.
|
Future bioengineers
“One of the most gratifying aspects of our work with VaNTH has been
bringing these concepts into middle schools and high schools,”
Harris says. “Many students who did not even know what
bioengineering was are now seriously considering it as a career
choice.” |
 |
They are also learning a great deal about physics, chemistry,
mathematics, biology, anatomy and other topics in the process.
Vanderbilt Research Assistant Professor
of Biomedical Engineering Stacy S. Klein has taught these modules in
several K-12 classes in Nashville.
One module she has used successfully in Nashville-area schools is
the “Iron Cross.”
The “Iron Cross” poses the challenge of understanding how an athlete
can hold his position in this gymnastics rings pose. Students must
learn about Newton’s laws, free-body diagrams showing the relative
magnitude and direction of all forces acting upon the body in that
position, and torque. Finally they mathematically analyze whether
two athletes can accomplish the inverted and vertical iron cross
positions.
“The students learn a great deal of material while enjoying the
process,” Klein says.
The Iron Cross module and other high-school-oriented modules have
also been tested successfully in Chicago, Boston, Austin, and San
Antonio.
Future of the field
“We’re just getting started,” Harris says. “In the seven years VaNTH
has been in operation, we’ve tackled an incredibly broad range of
issues and have been highly productive in creating great new
modules. But there is so much more to accomplish.”
For that reason, VaNTH will be extended beyond its eight-year
National Science Foundation-funded lifespan. As expected, the jump
start provided by the NSF enabled the new research center to
continue its work with other resources including NSF, university
private and other support. Northwestern University will take the
helm in the new center, with Vanderbilt’s continued participation.
“We have enjoyed great collaboration with our partners over the
seven years we have worked together,” Harris says. “We borrow from
each other’s strengths. We’ve experienced across-the-board
interaction in almost every research thrust area, and we have
successfully maximized interaction.”
Harris expects that degree of collaboration to continue as the
center reorganizes. With the ability to teach bioengineers to become
adaptive experts, the cornerstone is in place. Now the task of
disseminating these materials to bioengineering professors, to
instructors in other fields of engineering and science as well as
middle school and high school teachers must move forward.
Dissemination outside bioengineering has already begun with projects
in computer engineering, chemical engineering and mechanical
engineering currently underway.
Harris says that an additional focus of the new center will be the
further organization of the bioengineering curriculum to correspond
to needs of medicine and industry. A VaNTH survey showed remarkable
consistency between what professors and industry experts believe
students must know and be able to do, but the curriculum itself
needs to be more standardized across the nation.
“There is a lot of pressure on the curriculum to be more efficient
than in the past, to keep up with the progress in science and to
meet the needs medicine and industry have of engineers. We can’t
just add courses, we must integrate innovation into the teaching of
fundamental principles,” Harris says.
|
|