Undergraduate Education

  Graduate Education

  Research

  Departments & Programs

  For Alumni

  For Faculty and Staff
     Announcements 
 
       

 
    Engineering Intranet
       

     Faculty employment
     opportunities

       

     Faculty & staff directory
       

     Engineering School
     environmental health
     and safety

       

     Procedural guidelines
     for appointments,
     renewals, promotions
     and tenure

       

     School of Engineering
     rules and procedures

       

     Faculty spotlight
       

     Resources

  Visiting Vanderbilt

  About the School

 
  Home             News            Vanderbilt home page             Faculty and staff directory
     
 
Bringing engineering to life
 
It’s hard enough to understand how life works. But to be able to mathematically analyze the complexity of living systems and design technology that will work for, with and within human beings raises the bar significantly. And when you factor in the ever-expanding frontiers of knowledge in the life sciences and technology, that bar gets higher every year.

“Bioengineering lies at the intersection of biology, physics, chemistry, engineering and mathematics,” says Thomas R. Harris, M.D., Ph.D., director of the Vanderbilt-Northwestern-Texas-Harvard/MIT Engineering Research Center in Bioengineering Technologies (VaNTH). “The growing complexity in these fields has similarly complicated the bioengineering field, and that presents a challenge for educators who are trying to give students a foundation without requiring even more years of education.”
 

Challenge” is the operative word here.

VaNTH researchers have developed “challenge-based” educational techniques that are helping students understand the complexities of the material they must master by organizing the material around challenging problems they must tackle.

For example, here’s one challenge Vanderbilt Professor Robert Roselli uses in his undergraduate biotransport course: As a biomedical engineer, you are called to testify as an expert witness on behalf of the defendant, who is accused of murder. The body of her boyfriend was found at 5:30 a.m. in a creek behind her house. The prosecutor’s expert witness places the time of death at about midnight. The defendant has witnesses that account for her whereabouts before 11:00 p.m. and after 2:00 a.m., but she cannot provide an alibi for the period between 11:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. How did the prosecutor's expert witness arrive at the time of death? What information will you need to challenge that assessment?

“Students found this module to be fun and interesting because they could relate it to popular TV shows based on crime-scene investigations,” Roselli says. To get an accurate idea of the time of death, students learn about a variety of techniques, such as heat-transfer coefficients in air as well as water, and asymmetry of heat loss throughout the body. As they continue to research the problem and gain deeper understanding of the issues, their assessments change.

“The take-home message of this module is that models are only as accurate as the information provided and the validity of the assumptions made in their construction,” Roselli says. “That is a tremendously valuable lesson for these students to learn as future bioengineers.”

Classroom testing

The challenge-based techniques pioneered by VaNTH are proving even more successful than researchers had initially hoped. VaNTH testbed classrooms all over the country have turned in results that demonstrate that the challenge-based modules developed by VaNTH are more effective than ordinary classroom lectures.

What’s more, the techniques are helping produce what VaNTH calls “adaptive experts.”

“The issue is innovation and how to teach it,” Harris says. “An adaptive expert can solve problems never seen before, whereas a routine expert fits a new problem into an existing pattern.

“We used to spend a lot of time focusing on teaching efficiency and then make the adaptive leap in the senior year with a capstone design course that puts things together in an innovative way. Now we’re building innovation and efficiency as we go along,” he says.

Harris says that the heart of the technique is that students are more highly motivated to acquire basic knowledge and skills because they are motivated by thinking aboiut the challenge first. This motivation allows them to take ownership in both the solution and the process.

STAR Legacy Cycle

The process is outlined in what VaNTH calls the STAR Legacy Cycle. After being presented with the challenge, students brainstorm and share ideas about what they know and what they think they must learn about the problem. Then they do their own research and study to find out which of their ideas have merit, which leads to other proposed solutions.
Professors can guide and give feedback, and with the help of VaNTH-developed assessment materials, can monitor student progress and determine what additional assistance might be needed. Even standard lectures become more effective in this context because the challenge has created a “time for telling”.

Challenge-based techniques are based on learning science research, as outlined in the seminal work, /How People Learn. / This book, published by the National Research Council and edited by former Vanderbilt Centennial Professor of Psychology and Education John Bransford and associates, outlines radically different educational techniques from the traditional lecture format.

In addition to organizing and presenting the material differently, the modules incorporate use of web-based interactive programs that supplement classroom experience with computer-based exercises and materials.

Dozens of modules and collections of these modules known as “mosaics” have been developed by VaNTH researchers and are being put to use in college, high school and middle school classrooms. Professors and teachers can use the modules and can also develop new ones, using authoring software developed by VaNTH.

The authoring software and assessment software VaNTH developed are some of the tools educators need to incorporate challenge-based techniques in their classrooms. The authoring software gives professors and teachers a framework and an environment in which to develop material using challenge-based techniques. The software was designed to give professors numerous resources to create modules that are vibrant, interactive and engaging.

Educators can also use VaNTH’s assessment systems to help determine how much of the material their students are absorbing, and where additional intervention might be needed.
 

Future bioengineers

“One of the most gratifying aspects of our work with VaNTH has been bringing these concepts into middle schools and high schools,” Harris says. “Many students who did not even know what bioengineering was are now seriously considering it as a career choice.”

They are also learning a great deal about physics, chemistry, mathematics, biology, anatomy and other topics in the process.

Vanderbilt Research Assistant Professor of Biomedical Engineering Stacy S. Klein has taught these modules in several K-12 classes in Nashville.
One module she has used successfully in Nashville-area schools is the “Iron Cross.”

The “Iron Cross” poses the challenge of understanding how an athlete can hold his position in this gymnastics rings pose. Students must learn about Newton’s laws, free-body diagrams showing the relative magnitude and direction of all forces acting upon the body in that position, and torque. Finally they mathematically analyze whether two athletes can accomplish the inverted and vertical iron cross positions.

“The students learn a great deal of material while enjoying the process,” Klein says.

The Iron Cross module and other high-school-oriented modules have also been tested successfully in Chicago, Boston, Austin, and San Antonio.

Future of the field

“We’re just getting started,” Harris says. “In the seven years VaNTH has been in operation, we’ve tackled an incredibly broad range of issues and have been highly productive in creating great new modules. But there is so much more to accomplish.”

For that reason, VaNTH will be extended beyond its eight-year National Science Foundation-funded lifespan. As expected, the jump start provided by the NSF enabled the new research center to continue its work with other resources including NSF, university private and other support. Northwestern University will take the helm in the new center, with Vanderbilt’s continued participation.

“We have enjoyed great collaboration with our partners over the seven years we have worked together,” Harris says. “We borrow from each other’s strengths. We’ve experienced across-the-board interaction in almost every research thrust area, and we have successfully maximized interaction.”

Harris expects that degree of collaboration to continue as the center reorganizes. With the ability to teach bioengineers to become adaptive experts, the cornerstone is in place. Now the task of disseminating these materials to bioengineering professors, to instructors in other fields of engineering and science as well as middle school and high school teachers must move forward. Dissemination outside bioengineering has already begun with projects in computer engineering, chemical engineering and mechanical engineering currently underway.

Harris says that an additional focus of the new center will be the further organization of the bioengineering curriculum to correspond to needs of medicine and industry. A VaNTH survey showed remarkable consistency between what professors and industry experts believe students must know and be able to do, but the curriculum itself needs to be more standardized across the nation.

“There is a lot of pressure on the curriculum to be more efficient than in the past, to keep up with the progress in science and to meet the needs medicine and industry have of engineers. We can’t just add courses, we must integrate innovation into the teaching of fundamental principles,” Harris says.
 

Copyright © 2006 Vanderbilt University.
For more information, please contact the webmaster.